Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(scripts/cache-olean): --fetch queries a remote mathlib cache #1000

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cipher1024
Copy link
Collaborator

@cipher1024 cipher1024 commented May 8, 2019

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • for tactics:
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

@cipher1024 cipher1024 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2019 23:05
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

I guess this migrates to https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib-tools now?

@cipher1024
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Does github have an option to migrate PRs?

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

I would be surprised, especially since the repo isn't a fork. But you can just write the patch to a file, and replay it on the new repo...

@cipher1024
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That was my plan B. The other repo was created by just copying the history of the scripts/ directory over to a new repo.

@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

I don't think you can move the whole PR, but you can cherry-pick this one commit to mathlib-tools/master.

@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

Moved to leanprover-community/mathlib-tools#2

@robertylewis robertylewis deleted the olean-remote-cache branch August 26, 2020 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants