Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(algebra/group_power/order): Sign of an odd/even power without linearity #10122

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

This proves that a < 0 → 0 < a ^ bit0 n and a < 0 → a ^ bit1 n < 0 in an ordered_semiring.


Open in Gitpod

@RemyDegenne
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good to me.
bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Nov 4, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
…nearity (#10122)

This proves that `a < 0 → 0 < a ^ bit0 n` and `a < 0 → a ^ bit1 n < 0` in an `ordered_semiring`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 4, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(algebra/group_power/order): Sign of an odd/even power without linearity [Merged by Bors] - feat(algebra/group_power/order): Sign of an odd/even power without linearity Nov 4, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 4, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the odd_strict_mono_pow branch November 4, 2021 09:43
ericrbg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
…nearity (#10122)

This proves that `a < 0 → 0 < a ^ bit0 n` and `a < 0 → a ^ bit1 n < 0` in an `ordered_semiring`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants