Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - refactor(combinatorics/configuration): Implicit arguments for nondegenerate.eq_or_eq #10885

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tb65536
Copy link
Collaborator

@tb65536 tb65536 commented Dec 18, 2021

The arguments p₁, p₂, l₁, l₂ can be implicit, since they can be inferred from p₁ ∈ l₁, p₂ ∈ l₁, p₁ ∈ l₂, p₂ ∈ l₂.


Open in Gitpod

@tb65536 tb65536 added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Dec 18, 2021
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 20, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
…enerate.eq_or_eq` (#10885)

The arguments `p₁`, `p₂`, `l₁`, `l₂` can be implicit, since they can be inferred from `p₁ ∈ l₁`, `p₂ ∈ l₁`, `p₁ ∈ l₂`, `p₂ ∈ l₂`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Dec 20, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title refactor(combinatorics/configuration): Implicit arguments for nondegenerate.eq_or_eq [Merged by Bors] - refactor(combinatorics/configuration): Implicit arguments for nondegenerate.eq_or_eq Dec 20, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 20, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the configuration_implicit branch December 20, 2021 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants