Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(tactic/apply_fun): adds apply_fun tactic #1184

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 10, 2019
Merged

feat(tactic/apply_fun): adds apply_fun tactic #1184

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 10, 2019

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

@PatrickMassot PatrickMassot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2019 14:34
src/tactic/apply_fun.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tactic/apply_fun.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tactic/apply_fun.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@robertylewis robertylewis self-assigned this Jul 9, 2019
@robertylewis robertylewis added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Jul 10, 2019
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 0bc4a50 into master Jul 10, 2019
@mergify mergify bot deleted the apply_fun branch July 10, 2019 18:26
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…#1184)

* feat(tactic/apply_fun): adds `apply_fun` tactic

* move tests to test folder

* elaborate function with expected type

* fix merge mistake
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants