Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(tactic): fix tactic doc tags #12131

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

robertylewis
Copy link
Member


Open in Gitpod

@robertylewis robertylewis added easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 21, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022


Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 21, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(tactic): fix tactic doc tags [Merged by Bors] - chore(tactic): fix tactic doc tags Feb 21, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Feb 21, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the robertylewis/tactic-tags branch February 21, 2022 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants