Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/complex/upper_half_plane): extend action on upper half plane to GL_pos #12415

Closed
wants to merge 301 commits into from

Conversation

CBirkbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

@CBirkbeck CBirkbeck commented Mar 2, 2022

This extends the action on the upper half plane from SL_2 to GL_pos,


Open in Gitpod

/-- The action of `SL(2, ℝ)` on the upper half-plane by fractional linear transformations. -/
instance : mul_action SL(2, ℝ) ℍ :=
/-- The action of ` GL_pos 2 ℝ` on the upper half-plane by fractional linear transformations. -/
instance : mul_action (GL(2, ℝ)⁺) ℍ :=
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this work without the ()?

Suggested change
instance : mul_action (GL(2, ℝ)⁺) ℍ :=
instance : mul_action GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ :=

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, it complains :(

Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There seems to be a bunch of strange indentation in this diff; I've put comments on maybe about half of it, but it's probably easier for you to find the rest yourself.

src/analysis/complex/upper_half_plane.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/analysis/complex/upper_half_plane.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/analysis/complex/upper_half_plane.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/number_theory/modular.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@riccardobrasca
Copy link
Member

LGTM. Can you please update the description? If it is really a draft we should wait to merge it...

@CBirkbeck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LGTM. Can you please update the description? If it is really a draft we should wait to merge it...

No its no longer a draft, the description was outdated.

@riccardobrasca
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

bors merge

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2022
…plane to GL_pos (#12415)

This extends the action on the upper half plane from `SL_2` to `GL_pos`,



Co-authored-by: AlexKontorovich <58564076+AlexKontorovich@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 3, 2022
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 3, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(analysis/complex/upper_half_plane): extend action on upper half plane to GL_pos [Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/complex/upper_half_plane): extend action on upper half plane to GL_pos Jun 3, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 3, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the upper_half_plane_GL_pos_action branch June 3, 2022 08:38
tomaz1502 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2022
…plane to GL_pos (#12415)

This extends the action on the upper half plane from `SL_2` to `GL_pos`,



Co-authored-by: AlexKontorovich <58564076+AlexKontorovich@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants