Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - refactor(number_theory/padics/padic_norm): split file #13576

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

BoltonBailey
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR splits the initial part of the padic_norm.lean file that defines p-adic valuations into a new file called padic_val.lean. This split makes sense to me since it seems most files importing this don't actually use the norm, so those files can build more in parallel. It also seems like a good organizational change: This way people can look at the files in this directory and see immediately where the valuation is defined, and people looking for the definition of padic_norm in padic_norm.lean don't have to scroll.


Open in Gitpod

@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey added the awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. label Apr 21, 2022
@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey added easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. and removed easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. labels Apr 21, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. label Apr 21, 2022
@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Apr 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Apr 25, 2022
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Apr 25, 2022

Merge conflict.

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added the merge-conflict Please `git merge origin/master` then a bot will remove this label. label Apr 25, 2022
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant removed the merge-conflict Please `git merge origin/master` then a bot will remove this label. label Apr 25, 2022
@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Apr 25, 2022
@BoltonBailey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There was a merge conflict that I fixed, not sure if this needs to be told to merge again

@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey removed ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Apr 26, 2022
@BoltonBailey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems 13562 made some changes, let me fix this

@BoltonBailey BoltonBailey added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Apr 26, 2022
@riccardobrasca
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Apr 26, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
This PR splits the initial part of the `padic_norm.lean` file that defines p-adic valuations into a new file called `padic_val.lean`. This split makes sense to me since it seems most files importing this don't actually use the norm, so those files can build more in parallel. It also seems like a good organizational change: This way people can look at the files in this directory and see immediately where the valuation is defined, and people looking for the definition of `padic_norm` in `padic_norm.lean` don't have to scroll.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Apr 26, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title refactor(number_theory/padics/padic_norm): split file [Merged by Bors] - refactor(number_theory/padics/padic_norm): split file Apr 26, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Apr 26, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the BoltonBailey/split-padic-norm branch April 26, 2022 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants