[Merged by Bors] - chore(logic/function/basic): don't unfold set in cantor #13822
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think this counts as a |
|
bors d+ Consider changing the commit prefix, I agree with @vihdzp that chore is probably better |
|
✌️ digama0 can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
github-actions
bot
added
the
delegated
digama0
changed the title
|
bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2022
This uses `set_of` and `mem` consistently instead of using application everywhere, since `f` has type `A -> set A` instead of `A -> A -> Prop`. (Arguably, it could just be stated for `A -> A -> Prop` instead though.)
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This uses
set_ofandmemconsistently instead of using application everywhere, sincefhas typeA -> set Ainstead ofA -> A -> Prop. (Arguably, it could just be stated forA -> A -> Propinstead though.)