Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(order/filter/lift): drop an unneeded assumption #14117

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented May 12, 2022

Drop monotone _ assumptions in filter.comap_lift_eq and filter.comap_lift'_eq.


Open in Gitpod

@urkud urkud added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. labels May 12, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. label May 12, 2022
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels May 13, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2022
Drop `monotone _` assumptions in `filter.comap_lift_eq` and `filter.comap_lift'_eq`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented May 13, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(order/filter/lift): drop an unneeded assumption [Merged by Bors] - feat(order/filter/lift): drop an unneeded assumption May 13, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this May 13, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the YK-lift-assumption branch May 13, 2022 05:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants