Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(ring_theory/integral_closure): fix dot notation #14589

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ericrbg
Copy link
Collaborator

@ericrbg ericrbg commented Jun 7, 2022


Open in Gitpod

@ericrbg ericrbg added awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 7, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. label Jun 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors merge

Thanks!

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 7, 2022
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 7, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(ring_theory/integral_closure): fix dot notation [Merged by Bors] - chore(ring_theory/integral_closure): fix dot notation Jun 7, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 7, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the ericrbg/is_field_iff_dot_notation branch June 7, 2022 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants