Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(algebraic_geometry): Restriction of morphisms onto open sets of the target #14972

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

erdOne
Copy link
Member

@erdOne erdOne commented Jun 26, 2022


Open in Gitpod

@erdOne erdOne added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jun 26, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@alreadydone alreadydone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/algebraic_geometry/open_immersion.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alreadydone
Copy link
Collaborator

I made some formatting edits in a new branch. Mainly, I wouldn't indent after an equal sign or ≅, for example here, but others might have different opinion?

Another change is in affine_basis_cover_is_basis whose statement is made more succinct.

@erdOne
Copy link
Member Author

erdOne commented Jun 26, 2022

Thanks!
However, I would prefer to put this in a follow up PR since it touched too many things and could make the diff messy.

@alreadydone
Copy link
Collaborator

alreadydone commented Jun 26, 2022

Actually a recent commit by a maintainer does use indentation after =, so there's definite a different opinion, so feel free to revert those changes.

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 16, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2022
…the target (#14972)




Co-authored-by: Andrew Yang <36414270+erdOne@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 16, 2022

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2022
…the target (#14972)




Co-authored-by: Andrew Yang <36414270+erdOne@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 16, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(algebraic_geometry): Restriction of morphisms onto open sets of the target [Merged by Bors] - feat(algebraic_geometry): Restriction of morphisms onto open sets of the target Jul 16, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 16, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the morphism_restrict branch July 16, 2022 20:36
joelriou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
…the target (#14972)




Co-authored-by: Andrew Yang <36414270+erdOne@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants