-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(data/matrix/basic): add matrix.of for type casting #14992
Conversation
This means that a `vector` from a tactic block can be used in an expression.
…to eric-wieser/better-matrix-notation
…to eric-wieser/matrix-wip
…on' into eric-wieser/matrix-wip
Without this, it is easier to get confused between matrix and pi types, which have different multiplication operators.
…rix_algebra' into eric-wieser/matrix.of
This PR/issue depends on: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like a good change to me. The main thing is I'm not quite clear on the scope of this change: how did you determine which definitions/lemmas needed the insertion of of
? Should everything eventually transition to using of
?
My main approach was to search for I've added a longer module docstring as well as a extension of your suggested comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
bors r+
Build is failing. bors r- bors d+ |
✌️ eric-wieser can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Canceled. |
bors merge |
Without this, it is easier to get confused between matrix and pi types, which have different multiplication operators. With this in place, we can have a special matrix notation that actually produces terms of type `matrix`.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
Without this, it is easier to get confused between matrix and pi types, which have different multiplication operators. With this in place, we can have a special matrix notation that actually produces terms of type `matrix`.
Without this, it is easier to get confused between matrix and pi types, which have different multiplication operators.
With this in place, we can have a special matrix notation that actually produces terms of type
matrix
.matrix.map
#15040