Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(tactic/congrm + test/congrm): partially fix a parsing issue #15074

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

adomani
Copy link
Collaborator

@adomani adomani commented Jun 30, 2022

This PR tries to fix this issue raised by Heather. However, it only fixes the further minimized issue.

I added the solved issue as a test, but am stumped on solving the full issue.

E.g., can you get both of the following examples to work?

import tactic.congrm

--  works
example {a : Prop} :
  (∃ k : Prop, a) ↔ ∃ k : Prop, a :=
by congrm (∃ k, _); refl

--  fails
example {a : Prop} :
  (∃ k : Prop, a) ↔ ∃ k : Prop, a :=
by congrm ∃ k, _; refl

Open in Gitpod

@adomani adomani added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jun 30, 2022
@adomani adomani closed this Jun 30, 2022
@YaelDillies YaelDillies deleted the adomani_hacky_fix_congrm branch February 27, 2023 08:00
@YaelDillies YaelDillies removed the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants