-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/special_functions/gaussian): formula for gaussian integrals #15106
Conversation
sgouezel
commented
Jul 3, 2022
•
edited by github-actions
bot
Loading
edited by github-actions
bot
- depends on: [Merged by Bors] - chore(analysis/calculus/deriv): make the exponent explicit in pow lemmas #15117
- depends on: [Merged by Bors] - feat(topology/sets/compacts): prod constructions #15118
- depends on: [Merged by Bors] - feat(linear_algebra): basis on R × R, and relation between matrices and linear maps in this basis #15119
- depends on: [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): a product of Haar measures is a Haar measure #15120
- depends on: [Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/special_functions/polar_coord): define polar coordinates, polar change of variable formula in integrals #15258
Plus some minor lemmas for #15106.
Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Do you think it would be possible to avoid some of the integrability proofs by using nnreal valued functions ? Or are all of them useful anyway ?
Co-authored-by: Anatole Dedecker <anatolededecker@gmail.com>
I think the integrability statements are good to have anyway, so I haven't tried to avoid them. |
Thanks 🎉 bors merge |
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |