Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(order/filter): add map_neg_at_top, change some assumptions #15237

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Jul 11, 2022

  • add map_neg_at_top, map_neg_at_bot, comap_neg_at_top, and comap_neg_at_bot;
  • add disjoint_pure_at_top, disjoint_pure_at_bot, not_tendsto_const_at_top, not_tendsto_const_at_bot;
  • more lemmas about order_iso and at_top/at_bot up, no modifications to the code;
  • rename tendsto_at_top_iff_tends_to_neg_at_bot to tendsto_neg_at_top_iff, swap LHS and RHS, mark as @[simp];
  • rename tendsto_at_bot_iff_tends_to_neg_at_top to tendsto_neg_at_bot_iff, swap LHS and RHS, mark as @[simp];
  • use n ≠ 0 instead of 1 ≤ n in tendsto_pow_at_top, tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top, tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff, tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top, tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff.

Open in Gitpod

@urkud urkud added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. labels Jul 11, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-CI The author would like to see what CI has to say before doing more work. label Jul 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 16, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2022
…5237)

* add `map_neg_at_top`, `map_neg_at_bot`, `comap_neg_at_top`, and `comap_neg_at_bot`;
* add `disjoint_pure_at_top`, `disjoint_pure_at_bot`, `not_tendsto_const_at_top`, `not_tendsto_const_at_bot`;
* more lemmas about `order_iso` and `at_top`/`at_bot` up, no modifications to the code;
* rename `tendsto_at_top_iff_tends_to_neg_at_bot` to `tendsto_neg_at_top_iff`, swap LHS and RHS, mark as `@[simp]`;
* rename `tendsto_at_bot_iff_tends_to_neg_at_top` to `tendsto_neg_at_bot_iff`, swap LHS and RHS, mark as `@[simp]`;
* use `n ≠ 0` instead of `1 ≤ n` in `tendsto_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff`, `tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 16, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(order/filter): add map_neg_at_top, change some assumptions [Merged by Bors] - feat(order/filter): add map_neg_at_top, change some assumptions Jul 16, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 16, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the YK-map-neg-at-top branch July 16, 2022 13:55
joelriou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
…5237)

* add `map_neg_at_top`, `map_neg_at_bot`, `comap_neg_at_top`, and `comap_neg_at_bot`;
* add `disjoint_pure_at_top`, `disjoint_pure_at_bot`, `not_tendsto_const_at_top`, `not_tendsto_const_at_bot`;
* more lemmas about `order_iso` and `at_top`/`at_bot` up, no modifications to the code;
* rename `tendsto_at_top_iff_tends_to_neg_at_bot` to `tendsto_neg_at_top_iff`, swap LHS and RHS, mark as `@[simp]`;
* rename `tendsto_at_bot_iff_tends_to_neg_at_top` to `tendsto_neg_at_bot_iff`, swap LHS and RHS, mark as `@[simp]`;
* use `n ≠ 0` instead of `1 ≤ n` in `tendsto_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff`, `tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top`, `tendsto_neg_const_mul_pow_at_top_iff`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants