Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - doc(field_theory/splitting_field): update code example to reflect changes to diamond issues #15620

Closed

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

We now have infrastructure in place to avoid diamonds in nat/int/rat algebras, so we can't appeal to a lack of it when explaining diamond issues.


Open in Gitpod

@eric-wieser eric-wieser added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR docs This PR is about documentation labels Jul 22, 2022
@eric-wieser eric-wieser force-pushed the eric-wieser/tidy-splitting_field-docstring branch from c21a37f to 243c99c Compare July 22, 2022 09:24
@Vierkantor
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me see if I can't just fix this before we update the docs to say it can't be fixed...

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

I wouldn't say the docs says "this can't be fixed", they just more clearly say "this is broken" and remove the now-invalid excuse!

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

@Vierkantor could you please take another look? You've been working on the rat-diamond lately, right?

@Vierkantor
Copy link
Collaborator

Alright, let's merge this for now because the diamond is rather evil...

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 27, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
…nges to diamond issues (#15620)

We now have infrastructure in place to avoid diamonds in nat/int/rat algebras, so we can't appeal to a lack of it when explaining diamond issues.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 27, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title doc(field_theory/splitting_field): update code example to reflect changes to diamond issues [Merged by Bors] - doc(field_theory/splitting_field): update code example to reflect changes to diamond issues Jul 27, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 27, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the eric-wieser/tidy-splitting_field-docstring branch July 27, 2022 19:44
bottine pushed a commit to bottine/mathlib that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2022
…nges to diamond issues (leanprover-community#15620)

We now have infrastructure in place to avoid diamonds in nat/int/rat algebras, so we can't appeal to a lack of it when explaining diamond issues.
robertylewis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
…nges to diamond issues (#15620)

We now have infrastructure in place to avoid diamonds in nat/int/rat algebras, so we can't appeal to a lack of it when explaining diamond issues.
khwilson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
…nges to diamond issues (#15620)

We now have infrastructure in place to avoid diamonds in nat/int/rat algebras, so we can't appeal to a lack of it when explaining diamond issues.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs This PR is about documentation ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants