[Merged by Bors] - refactor(measure_theory/function/uniform_integrable): change uniform_integrable to only require ae_strongly_measurable
#15623
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JasonKYi
added
the
awaiting-review
1 task
sgouezel
reviewed
Jul 22, 2022
sgouezel
added
awaiting-author
JasonKYi
added
awaiting-review
|
bors r+ |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2022
…_integrable` to only require `ae_strongly_measurable` (#15623) The L¹ version of the strong LLN does not require `strongly_measurable` but the assumption in `uniform_integrable` forces it to have this condition if not requiring an extra step to relax the condition (see #15392). This PR relaxes the definition of `uniform_integrable` so it only requires `ae_strongly_measurable`.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
uniform_integrable to only require ae_strongly_measurableuniform_integrable to only require ae_strongly_measurable
bottine
pushed a commit
to bottine/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2022
…_integrable` to only require `ae_strongly_measurable` (leanprover-community#15623) The L¹ version of the strong LLN does not require `strongly_measurable` but the assumption in `uniform_integrable` forces it to have this condition if not requiring an extra step to relax the condition (see leanprover-community#15392). This PR relaxes the definition of `uniform_integrable` so it only requires `ae_strongly_measurable`.
robertylewis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2022
…_integrable` to only require `ae_strongly_measurable` (#15623) The L¹ version of the strong LLN does not require `strongly_measurable` but the assumption in `uniform_integrable` forces it to have this condition if not requiring an extra step to relax the condition (see #15392). This PR relaxes the definition of `uniform_integrable` so it only requires `ae_strongly_measurable`.
khwilson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2022
…_integrable` to only require `ae_strongly_measurable` (#15623) The L¹ version of the strong LLN does not require `strongly_measurable` but the assumption in `uniform_integrable` forces it to have this condition if not requiring an extra step to relax the condition (see #15392). This PR relaxes the definition of `uniform_integrable` so it only requires `ae_strongly_measurable`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The L¹ version of the strong LLN does not require
strongly_measurablebut the assumption inuniform_integrableforces it to have this condition if not requiring an extra step to relax the condition (see #15392). This PR relaxes the definition ofuniform_integrableso it only requiresae_strongly_measurable.