Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso #17771

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

Put together a few results into one that TC inference can use.


Open in Gitpod

@YaelDillies YaelDillies requested a review from a team as a code owner November 30, 2022 10:50
@YaelDillies YaelDillies added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-measure-probability Measure theory / Probability theory labels Nov 30, 2022
Comment on lines 725 to 727
instance (e : G ≃ₗ[𝕜] H) : is_add_haar_measure (μ.map e) :=
e.to_add_equiv.is_add_haar_measure_map _ (e : G →ₗ[𝕜] H).continuous_of_finite_dimensional
(e.symm : H →ₗ[𝕜] G).continuous_of_finite_dimensional
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is finite-dimensionality only used explicitly? If so, could you also add a version where e : G ≃L[𝕜] H without finite-dimensionality assumptions?

bors d+

Copy link
Collaborator

@sgouezel sgouezel Nov 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also use this to golf the proof of map_linear_map_add_haar_eq_smul_add_haar? (where an instance would become unnecessary, as well as a few facts like Ce or Cesymm only used to prove the instance).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will golf map_linear_map_add_haar_eq_smul_add_haar separately because I have more API incoming that will shorten it.

bors merge

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 30, 2022

✌️ YaelDillies can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
…inear iso (#17771)

Put together a few results into one that TC inference can use.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso Nov 30, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 30, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the is_add_haar_measure_map branch November 30, 2022 23:38
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso [Merged by Bors] - [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso Nov 30, 2022
@YaelDillies YaelDillies changed the title [Merged by Bors] - [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/group/measure): Mapping an Haar measure under a linear iso Feb 1, 2023
@YaelDillies YaelDillies removed the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
t-measure-probability Measure theory / Probability theory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants