Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(combinatorics/simple_graph/acyclic): Number of edges of a tree #18638

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

The number of edges of a tree is one less than the number of vertices.

Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta bhavikmehta8@gmail.com


Open in Gitpod

@YaelDillies YaelDillies requested a review from a team as a code owner March 23, 2023 11:29
@YaelDillies YaelDillies added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-combinatorics Combinatorics labels Mar 23, 2023
@YaelDillies YaelDillies changed the title feat(combinatorics/simple_graph./acyclic): Number of edges of a tree feat(combinatorics/simple_graph/acyclic): Number of edges of a tree Mar 23, 2023
@semorrison semorrison added the modifies-synchronized-file This PR touches a files that has already been ported to mathlib4, and may need a synchronization PR. label Mar 28, 2023
@kmill
Copy link
Collaborator

kmill commented Apr 10, 2023

@YaelDillies FYI, I'm reviewing this right now by porting it to Lean 4. I'll tag you once I'm done.

@kmill
Copy link
Collaborator

kmill commented Jul 15, 2023

I lost track of what I did with the first port of this, but here's a port: leanprover-community/mathlib4#5918

Let me know if you need this in mathlib3, and otherwise please close this branch.

@eric-wieser eric-wieser added the not-too-late This PR was ready at the point mathlib3 was frozen: we will try to merge it and port it to mathlib4 label Jul 15, 2023
@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We do not. This was a one day project with no application in sight.

@YaelDillies YaelDillies deleted the tree_card_edges branch July 15, 2023 15:58
bors bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
Port/review of [mathlib#18638](leanprover-community/mathlib#18638) directly to Mathlib4.

Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
semorrison pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Port/review of [mathlib#18638](leanprover-community/mathlib#18638) directly to Mathlib4.

Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
semorrison pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Port/review of [mathlib#18638](leanprover-community/mathlib#18638) directly to Mathlib4.

Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
semorrison pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
Port/review of [mathlib#18638](leanprover-community/mathlib#18638) directly to Mathlib4.

Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
semorrison pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
Port/review of [mathlib#18638](leanprover-community/mathlib#18638) directly to Mathlib4.

Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR modifies-synchronized-file This PR touches a files that has already been ported to mathlib4, and may need a synchronization PR. not-too-late This PR was ready at the point mathlib3 was frozen: we will try to merge it and port it to mathlib4 t-combinatorics Combinatorics
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants