[Merged by Bors] - feat(group_theory/order_of_element): order_of_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one #2364
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kbuzzard
added
the
awaiting-review
sgouezel
reviewed
Apr 9, 2020
ChrisHughes24
added
awaiting-author
kbuzzard
added
awaiting-review
|
bors r+ |
ChrisHughes24
added
ready-to-merge
ChrisHughes24
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2020
Build succeeded |
Pull request successfully merged into master. |
bors
bot
changed the title
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2020
cipher1024
pushed a commit
to cipher1024/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TO CONTRIBUTORS:
Make sure you have:
If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.
For reviewers: code review check list
--
Filling in a hole I ran into whilst writing a codewars kata