Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(topology/separation): prove that {y | y ≠ x} is open #2506

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Apr 23, 2020

No description provided.

@@ -120,10 +120,12 @@ class t1_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
lemma is_closed_singleton [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_closed ({x} : set α) :=
t1_space.t1 x

lemma is_open_ne [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_open {y | y ≠ x} :=
by simpa using is_open_neg (t1_space.t1 x)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was there a PR that changed the naming convention, so is_open_neg should now be is_open_compl?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is_open_neg uses set_of. We also have is_open_compl_iff.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After e8a68de is_open_neg is never used in mathlib.

@urkud urkud added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Apr 24, 2020
@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Apr 24, 2020
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Apr 25, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(topology/separation): prove that {y | y ≠ x} is open [Merged by Bors] - chore(topology/separation): prove that {y | y ≠ x} is open Apr 25, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Apr 25, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the is-open-ne branch April 25, 2020 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants