New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(tsum): use ∑' instead of ∑ as notation #2571
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sgouezel
reviewed
Apr 30, 2020
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
bors r+ |
github-actions
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
label
Apr 30, 2020
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2020
As discussed in: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/big.20ops/near/195821357 This is the result of ``` git grep -l '∑' | grep -v "mean_ineq" | xargs sed -i "s/∑/∑'/g" ``` after manually cleaning some occurences of `∑` in TeX strings. Probably `∑` has now also been changed in a lot of comments and docstrings, but my reasoning is that if the string "tsum" occurs in the file, then it doesn't do harm to write `∑'` instead of `∑` in the comments as well.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
refactor(tsum): use ∑' instead of ∑ as notation
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(tsum): use ∑' instead of ∑ as notation
Apr 30, 2020
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
…#2571) As discussed in: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/big.20ops/near/195821357 This is the result of ``` git grep -l '∑' | grep -v "mean_ineq" | xargs sed -i "s/∑/∑'/g" ``` after manually cleaning some occurences of `∑` in TeX strings. Probably `∑` has now also been changed in a lot of comments and docstrings, but my reasoning is that if the string "tsum" occurs in the file, then it doesn't do harm to write `∑'` instead of `∑` in the comments as well.
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2020
…#2571) As discussed in: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/big.20ops/near/195821357 This is the result of ``` git grep -l '∑' | grep -v "mean_ineq" | xargs sed -i "s/∑/∑'/g" ``` after manually cleaning some occurences of `∑` in TeX strings. Probably `∑` has now also been changed in a lot of comments and docstrings, but my reasoning is that if the string "tsum" occurs in the file, then it doesn't do harm to write `∑'` instead of `∑` in the comments as well.
cipher1024
pushed a commit
to cipher1024/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
…#2571) As discussed in: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/big.20ops/near/195821357 This is the result of ``` git grep -l '∑' | grep -v "mean_ineq" | xargs sed -i "s/∑/∑'/g" ``` after manually cleaning some occurences of `∑` in TeX strings. Probably `∑` has now also been changed in a lot of comments and docstrings, but my reasoning is that if the string "tsum" occurs in the file, then it doesn't do harm to write `∑'` instead of `∑` in the comments as well.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/big.20ops/near/195821357
This is the result of
after manually cleaning some occurences of
∑
in TeX strings. Probably∑
has now also been changed in a lot of comments and docstrings, but my reasoning is that if the string "tsum" occurs in the file, then it doesn't do harm to write∑'
instead of∑
in the comments as well.TO CONTRIBUTORS:
Please include a summary of the changes made in this PR above "TO CONTRIBUTORS:", as that text will become the commit message. You are also encouraged to append the following co-authorship template if you'd like to acknowledge suggestions / commits made by other users:
Co-authored-by: name name@example.com
Make sure you have:
If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.
For reviewers: code review check list
If you're confused by comments on your PR like
bors r+
orbors d+
, please see our notes on bors for information on our merging workflow.