Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/fractional_ideal): pushforward of fractional ideals #2984

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Vierkantor
Copy link
Collaborator

Extend submodule.map to fractional ideals by showing that the pushforward is also fractional.

For this, we need a slightly tweaked definition of fractional ideal: if we localize R at the submonoid S, the old definition required a nonzero x : R such that xI ≤ R, and the new definition requires x ∈ S instead. In the most common case, S = non_zero_divisors R, the results are exactly the same, and all operations are still the same.

A practical use of these pushforwards is included: canonical_equiv states fractional ideals don't depend on choice of localization map.

Extend `submodule.map` to fractional ideals by showing that the pushforward is
also fractional.

For this, we need a slightly tweaked definition of fractional ideal: if we
localize `R` at the submonoid `S`, the old definition required a nonzero
`x : R` such that `xI ≤ R`, and the new definition requires `x ∈ S` instead.
In the most common case, `S = non_zero_divisors R`, the results are exactly
the same, and all operations are still the same.

As a bonus, a proof that the fractional ideals don't depend on choice of
localization map.
@Vierkantor Vierkantor added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jun 8, 2020
Co-Authored-By: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2020
…2984)

Extend `submodule.map` to fractional ideals by showing that the pushforward is also fractional.

For this, we need a slightly tweaked definition of fractional ideal: if we localize `R` at the submonoid `S`, the old definition required a nonzero `x : R` such that `xI ≤ R`, and the new definition requires `x ∈ S` instead. In the most common case, `S = non_zero_divisors R`, the results are exactly the same, and all operations are still the same.

A practical use of these pushforwards is included: `canonical_equiv` states fractional ideals don't depend on choice of localization map.

Co-authored-by: Vierkantor <Vierkantor@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 8, 2020
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 8, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(ring_theory/fractional_ideal): pushforward of fractional ideals [Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/fractional_ideal): pushforward of fractional ideals Jun 8, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 8, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the fractional_ideal_map branch June 8, 2020 15:06
cipher1024 pushed a commit to cipher1024/mathlib that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
…eanprover-community#2984)

Extend `submodule.map` to fractional ideals by showing that the pushforward is also fractional.

For this, we need a slightly tweaked definition of fractional ideal: if we localize `R` at the submonoid `S`, the old definition required a nonzero `x : R` such that `xI ≤ R`, and the new definition requires `x ∈ S` instead. In the most common case, `S = non_zero_divisors R`, the results are exactly the same, and all operations are still the same.

A practical use of these pushforwards is included: `canonical_equiv` states fractional ideals don't depend on choice of localization map.

Co-authored-by: Vierkantor <Vierkantor@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants