Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/special_functions/pow): inv_rpow, div_rpow #2999

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Jun 9, 2020

Also use notation ℝ≥0 and use nnreal.eq instead of rw ← nnreal.coe_eq.


Also use notation `ℝ≥0` and use `nnreal.eq` instead of `rw ← nnreal.coe_eq`.
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

sgouezel commented Jun 9, 2020

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Jun 9, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
Also use notation `ℝ≥0` and use `nnreal.eq` instead of `rw ← nnreal.coe_eq`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 9, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(analysis/special_functions/pow): inv_rpow, div_rpow [Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/special_functions/pow): inv_rpow, div_rpow Jun 9, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 9, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the rpow-div branch June 9, 2020 09:07
cipher1024 pushed a commit to cipher1024/mathlib that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
…ver-community#2999)

Also use notation `ℝ≥0` and use `nnreal.eq` instead of `rw ← nnreal.coe_eq`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants