Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/polynomial/homogeneous): definition and basic props #3223

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

jcommelin
Copy link
Member

This PR also move ring_theory/polynomial.lean to
ring_theory/polynomial/basic.lean

This PR is part of bringing symmetric polynomials to mathlib,
and besided that, I also expect to add binomial polynomials
and Chebyshev polynomials in the future.
Altogether, this motivates the starting of a ring_theory/polynomial
directory.
The file basic.lean may need cleaning or splitting at some point.


This PR also move ring_theory/polynomial.lean to
ring_theory/polynomial/basic.lean

This PR is part of bringing symmetric polynomials to mathlib,
and besided that, I also expect to add binomial polynomials
and Chebyshev polynomials in the future.
Altogether, this motivates the starting of a ring_theory/polynomial
directory.
The file basic.lean may need cleaning or splitting at some point.
@jcommelin jcommelin added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jun 29, 2020
@semorrison semorrison added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 30, 2020
Vierkantor added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
…_theory.polynomial.basic`

This PR is the intersection of #3223 and #3241, allowing them to be merged in either order.

Zulip discussion: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/where.20should.20these.20definitions.20live.3F
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
…_theory.polynomial.basic` (#3248)

This PR is the intersection of #3223 and #3241, allowing them to be merged in either order.

Zulip discussion: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/where.20should.20these.20definitions.20live.3F



Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Jul 25, 2020
@robertylewis robertylewis added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 25, 2020
@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Aug 14, 2020
import data.mv_polynomial
import data.fintype.card
import tactic
#print tactic.interactive.squeeze_simp
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
#print tactic.interactive.squeeze_simp

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did this pass CI? @bryangingechen @robertylewis
I remember putting this #print statement here exactly because I wanted CI to remind me that I should minimize imports... but apparently that trick doesn't work.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI doesn't check for a lack of #print statements. If you want a warning, #check a declaration that doesn't exist.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ooh, I thought it would complain about printing output...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be possible to set it up to do that. I can't work on it right now, but please make an issue if you think it's a feature worth having and I'll try to come back to it when I can.

@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM otherwise.

bors d+

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Aug 15, 2020

✌️ jcommelin can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

No idea why the docs build failed, but I see this is on an old Lean, so I'm gonna merge master.

@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Aug 16, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2020
…3223)

This PR also move ring_theory/polynomial.lean to
ring_theory/polynomial/basic.lean

This PR is part of bringing symmetric polynomials to mathlib,
and besided that, I also expect to add binomial polynomials
and Chebyshev polynomials in the future.
Altogether, this motivates the starting of a ring_theory/polynomial
directory.
The file basic.lean may need cleaning or splitting at some point.




Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <Rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Aug 16, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(ring_theory/polynomial/homogeneous): definition and basic props [Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/polynomial/homogeneous): definition and basic props Aug 16, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Aug 16, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the homogeneous branch August 16, 2020 07:20
cipher1024 pushed a commit to cipher1024/mathlib that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
…_theory.polynomial.basic` (leanprover-community#3248)

This PR is the intersection of leanprover-community#3223 and leanprover-community#3241, allowing them to be merged in either order.

Zulip discussion: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/where.20should.20these.20definitions.20live.3F



Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants