Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - refactor(topology/dense_embedding): simplify proof #3329

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

Using filter bases, we can give a cleaner proof of continuity of extension by continuity. Also switch to use the "new" continuous_at in the statement.


@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Jul 9, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2020
Using filter bases, we can give a cleaner proof of continuity of extension by continuity. Also switch to use the "new" `continuous_at` in the statement.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 9, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title refactor(topology/dense_embedding): simplify proof [Merged by Bors] - refactor(topology/dense_embedding): simplify proof Jul 9, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 9, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the extend branch July 9, 2020 05:01
cipher1024 pushed a commit to cipher1024/mathlib that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
…ity#3329)

Using filter bases, we can give a cleaner proof of continuity of extension by continuity. Also switch to use the "new" `continuous_at` in the statement.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants