Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Merged by Bors] - chore(data/equiv/basic): avoid λ ⟨a, b⟩ in some defs, add simp lemmas #3530

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - chore(data/equiv/basic): avoid λ ⟨a, b⟩ in some defs, add simp lemmas #3530

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Jul 23, 2020

@urkud urkud added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jul 23, 2020
@ChrisHughes24
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 23, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2020
@urkud
chore(data/equiv/basic): avoid λ ⟨a, b⟩ in some defs, add simp le…
289d17c 
…mmas (#3530)
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 23, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(data/equiv/basic): avoid λ ⟨a, b⟩ in some defs, add simp lemmas [Merged by Bors] - chore(data/equiv/basic): avoid λ ⟨a, b⟩ in some defs, add simp lemmas Jul 23, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 23, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the equiv-sigma branch July 23, 2020 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@urkud @ChrisHughes24