Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(topology): rename interior_eq_of_open #3614

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

This allows to use dot notation and is more consistent with
its closed twin is_closed.closure_eq


@PatrickMassot PatrickMassot added easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 28, 2020
This allows to use dot notation and is more consistent with
its closed twin is_closed.closure_eq
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 28, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2020
This allows to use dot notation and is more consistent with
its closed twin is_closed.closure_eq
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 28, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(topology): rename interior_eq_of_open [Merged by Bors] - chore(topology): rename interior_eq_of_open Jul 28, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 28, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the interior_eq branch July 28, 2020 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants