[Merged by Bors] - docs(category_theory/limits/cones): cones documentation and equivalence fixup #3795
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
b-mehta
added
easy
|
✌️ b-mehta can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2020
…ce fixup (#3795) Mostly adding documentation in `ct.limits.cones`, but also shortened a couple of proofs. I also adjusted a couple of statements for `is_equivalence` to match the `is_equivalence` projections which are meant to be used (these statements were only used for cones anyway).
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
YaelDillies
removed
the
awaiting-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mostly adding documentation in
ct.limits.cones, but also shortened a couple of proofs. I also adjusted a couple of statements foris_equivalenceto match theis_equivalenceprojections which are meant to be used (these statements were only used for cones anyway).