New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/asymptotics): Equivalent definitions for is_[oO] u v l
looking like u = φ * v
for some φ
#4646
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My laptop is currently half-broken, so I haven't tested any of the suggestions. Most of them are about using eventually.mono
in more cases.
Co-authored-by: Bryan Gin-ge Chen <bryangingechen@gmail.com>
I'm sorry for adding unrelated material to the PR. I didn't think that adding these two |
Co-authored-by: hrmacbeth <25316162+hrmacbeth@users.noreply.github.com>
bors merge |
…` looking like `u = φ * v` for some `φ` (#4646) The advantage of these statements over `u/v` tendsto 0 / is bounded is they do not require any nonvanishing assumptions about `v` Co-authored-by: Yury G. Kudryashov <urkud@urkud.name>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
is_[oO] u v l
looking like u = φ * v
for some φ
is_[oO] u v l
looking like u = φ * v
for some φ
…` looking like `u = φ * v` for some `φ` (leanprover-community#4646) The advantage of these statements over `u/v` tendsto 0 / is bounded is they do not require any nonvanishing assumptions about `v` Co-authored-by: Yury G. Kudryashov <urkud@urkud.name>
The advantage of these statements over
u/v
tendsto 0 / is bounded is they do not require any nonvanishing assumptions aboutv
These are preliminaries for defining and proving basic lemmas about the "asymptotic equivalence" relation.
@[simp]
attrs #4775pi.has_div
#4776