-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(linear_algebra/nonsingular_inverse): state Cramer's rule explicitly #4700
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mostly so that we can add an entry to the Freek 100.
ocfnash
added
the
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
label
Oct 19, 2020
jcommelin
reviewed
Oct 19, 2020
I feel this is cleaner, though it's obviously a subjective call.
ocfnash
commented
Oct 20, 2020
ocfnash
added
WIP
Work in progress
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Oct 21, 2020
…ow`. This really just moves a transpose operation from the definition of `cramer_map` to the definition of `adjugate`. I claim the new definitions have the slight advantage of being more conventional. In the course of doing this I noticed that there still seem to be a few places where the words 'row' and 'column' are backwards. I fixed the instances that I encountered but did not attempt an exhaustive search.
ocfnash
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
and removed
WIP
Work in progress
labels
Oct 21, 2020
jcommelin
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 🎉
bors d+
✌️ ocfnash can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
jcommelin
added
awaiting-author
A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes
delegated
The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions.
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Oct 22, 2020
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2020
…tly (#4700) Mostly so that we can add an entry to the Freek 100. Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net> Co-authored-by: Vierkantor <vierkantor@vierkantor.com>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
feat(linear_algebra/nonsingular_inverse): state Cramer's rule explicitly
[Merged by Bors] - feat(linear_algebra/nonsingular_inverse): state Cramer's rule explicitly
Oct 22, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-author
A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes
delegated
The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mostly so that we can add an entry to the Freek 100.
Note that we state this using the slightly low-level
matrix.mul_vec
instead of building on top ofmatrix.to_lin'
. This is partly because the current status of the import hierarchy (matrix.to_lin'
is defined in a file importingnonsingular_inverse.lean
) and partly because the statement in terms ofto_lin'
turns out to need additional ascriptions which, IMHO, render the statement ofcramers_rule
even less readable to the casual reader arriving from the Freek list.Notwithstanding the above, I am more than happy to be persuaded to do things differently!