Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(category_theory/limits/preserves): split up files and remove redundant defs #4717

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

b-mehta
Copy link
Collaborator

@b-mehta b-mehta commented Oct 20, 2020

Broken off from #4163 and #4716.
While the diff of this PR is quite big, it actually doesn't do very much:

  • I removed the definitions of preserves_(co)limits_iso from preserves/basic, since there's already a version in preserves/shapes which has lemmas about it. (I didn't keep them in preserves/basic since that file is already getting quite big, so I chose to instead put them into the smaller file.
  • I split up preserves/shapes into two files: preserves/limits and preserves/shapes. From my other PRs my plan is for shapes to contain isomorphisms and constructions for special shapes, eg fan.mk and forks, some of which aren't already present, and limits to have things for the general case. In this PR I don't change the situation for special shapes (other than simplifying some proofs), other than moving it into a separate file for clarity.

@b-mehta b-mehta added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Oct 20, 2020
@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Oct 21, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2020
…dundant defs (#4717)

Broken off from #4163 and #4716.
While the diff of this PR is quite big, it actually doesn't do very much: 

- I removed the definitions of `preserves_(co)limits_iso` from `preserves/basic`, since there's already a version in `preserves/shapes` which has lemmas about it. (I didn't keep them in `preserves/basic` since that file is already getting quite big, so I chose to instead put them into the smaller file.
- I split up `preserves/shapes` into two files: `preserves/limits` and `preserves/shapes`. From my other PRs my plan is for `shapes` to contain isomorphisms and constructions for special shapes, eg `fan.mk` and `fork`s, some of which aren't already present, and `limits` to have things for the general case. In this PR I don't change the situation for special shapes (other than simplifying some proofs), other than moving it into a separate file for clarity.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 21, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(category_theory/limits/preserves): split up files and remove redundant defs [Merged by Bors] - chore(category_theory/limits/preserves): split up files and remove redundant defs Oct 21, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Oct 21, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the preserves-split branch October 21, 2020 01:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants