Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(control/equiv_functor): simp defn lemmas and injectivity #5739

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pechersky
Copy link
Collaborator

@pechersky pechersky commented Jan 14, 2021

Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser wieser.eric@gmail.com


Stubbed out from #5593

@pechersky pechersky added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jan 14, 2021
@gebner
Copy link
Member

gebner commented Jan 14, 2021

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 14, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jan 14, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(control/equiv_functor): simp defn lemmas and injectivity [Merged by Bors] - feat(control/equiv_functor): simp defn lemmas and injectivity Jan 14, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Jan 14, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the pechersky/equiv-functor-lemmas branch January 14, 2021 19:05
b-mehta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2021
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants