Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/calculus/inverse): a function with onto strict derivative is locally onto #6229

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

@sgouezel sgouezel commented Feb 14, 2021

Removes a useless assumption in map_nhds_eq_of_complemented (no need to have a completemented subspace).

The proof of the local inverse theorem breaks into two parts, local injectivity and local surjectivity. We refactor the local surjectivity part, assuming in the proof only that the derivative is onto. The result is stronger, but the proof is less streamlined since there is no contracting map any more: we give a naive proof from first principles instead of reducing to the fixed point theorem for contracting maps.

@sgouezel sgouezel added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Feb 14, 2021
end

/-- A surjective continuous linear map admits a (possibly nonlinear) controlled right inverse.
In general, it is not possible to ensure that such a right inverse is linear. -/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add "between Banach spaces"?

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel.

@urkud
Copy link
Member

urkud commented Feb 14, 2021

Thanks!
bors d+

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 14, 2021

✌️ sgouezel can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@urkud urkud added delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 14, 2021
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Feb 14, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2021
…ve is locally onto (#6229)

Removes a useless assumption in `map_nhds_eq_of_complemented` (no need to have a completemented subspace).

The proof of the local inverse theorem breaks into two parts, local injectivity and local surjectivity. We refactor the local surjectivity part, assuming in the proof only that the derivative is onto. The result is stronger, but the proof is less streamlined since there is no contracting map any more: we give a naive proof from first principles instead of reducing to the fixed point theorem for contracting maps.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 15, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(analysis/calculus/inverse): a function with onto strict derivative is locally onto [Merged by Bors] - feat(analysis/calculus/inverse): a function with onto strict derivative is locally onto Feb 15, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Feb 15, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the inverse_of_onto branch February 15, 2021 03:01
b-mehta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2021
…ve is locally onto (#6229)

Removes a useless assumption in `map_nhds_eq_of_complemented` (no need to have a completemented subspace).

The proof of the local inverse theorem breaks into two parts, local injectivity and local surjectivity. We refactor the local surjectivity part, assuming in the proof only that the derivative is onto. The result is stronger, but the proof is less streamlined since there is no contracting map any more: we give a naive proof from first principles instead of reducing to the fixed point theorem for contracting maps.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions. ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants