New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(order/filter/filter_product): build hyperreals #801
Conversation
Comments on the form:
Otherwise, the maths look good (except that you are missing a field instance when your filter is a ultrafilter). |
23f80f4
to
6bbe86a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @abhimanyupallavisudhir,
the formalization looks really nice. I have a couple of style comments and requests for changes.
Construction of filter products, ultraproducts, some instances, hyperreal numbers.
@abhimanyupallavisudhir I already made the fix and checked compilation on my machine. I am just waiting for the Travis check to finish, and then I'll merge. |
Isn't making |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realise I'm a bit late with these comments, as @avigad was already talking about merging this. I don't mind if you ignore these comments... they're not that important.
I should stress that I think this is a cool PR!
@abhimanyupallavisudhir I didn't even see your change. I think we pushed them at the same time. Could you make the argument implicit again and adapt @jcommelin's suggestions as you see fit? Then I'll merge right away. |
Ok, all done. |
…nity#801) Construction of filter products, ultraproducts, some instances, hyperreal numbers.
Construction of "filter products" (ultraproducts on a general filter), ultraproducts, some instances, hyperreal numbers. Not sure if it belongs in another folder.