New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore(*): Fix syntactic tautologies #8811
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eric-wieser
reviewed
Aug 22, 2021
eric-wieser
reviewed
Aug 22, 2021
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
alexjbest
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
and removed
WIP
Work in progress
labels
Aug 23, 2021
1 task
alexjbest
added
WIP
Work in progress
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Aug 23, 2021
alexjbest
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
and removed
WIP
Work in progress
labels
Aug 24, 2021
bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Aug 26, 2021
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
Fix a few lemmas that were accidentally tautological in the sense that they were equations with syntactically equal LHS and RHS. A linter will be added in a second PR, for now we just fix the found issues. It would be great if a category expert like @semorrison would check the category ones, as its unclear to me which direction they are meant to go. As pointed out by @PatrickMassot on Zulip https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/syntactic.20tautology.20linter/near/250267477. Thanks to @eric-wieser for helping figure out the corrected versions.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
chore(*): Fix syntactic tautologies
[Merged by Bors] - chore(*): Fix syntactic tautologies
Aug 26, 2021
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
Add a linter that checks whether a lemma is a declaration that `∀ a b ... z,e₁ = e₂` where `e₁` and `e₂` are equal exprs, we call declarations of this form syntactic tautologies. Such lemmas are (mostly) useless and sometimes introduced unintentionally when proving basic facts with rfl when elaboration results in a different term than the user intended. @PatrickMassot suggested this at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/syntactic.20tautology.20linter/near/250267477. The found problems are fixed in #8811. Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <Rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix a few lemmas that were accidentally tautological in the sense that they were equations with syntactically equal LHS and RHS.
A linter will be added in a second PR, for now we just fix the found issues.
It would be great if a category expert like @semorrison would check the category ones, as its unclear to me which direction they are meant to go.
As pointed out by @PatrickMassot on Zulip https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/syntactic.20tautology.20linter/near/250267477.
Thanks to @eric-wieser for helping figure out the corrected versions.