Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: pp_dot on ℝ≥0∞ definitions #10837

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator


Open in Gitpod

@YaelDillies YaelDillies added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. labels Feb 21, 2024
@fpvandoorn
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 21, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: pp_dot on ℝ≥0∞ definitions [Merged by Bors] - chore: pp_dot on ℝ≥0∞ definitions Feb 22, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Feb 22, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the pp_dot_ennreal branch February 22, 2024 00:33
thorimur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
thorimur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
riccardobrasca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
dagurtomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants