Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat: Subsingleton.pairwise #10938

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jsm28
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsm28 jsm28 commented Feb 24, 2024

We have Set.Subsingleton.pairwise, but not, it seems, the corresponding lemma for Pairwise as applied to a relation on a subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.


Open in Gitpod

We have `Set.Subsingleton.pairwise`, but not, it seems, the
corresponding lemma for `Pairwise` as applied to a relation on a
subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.
@jsm28 jsm28 added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. labels Feb 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors merge

Thanks!

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 25, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
We have `Set.Subsingleton.pairwise`, but not, it seems, the corresponding lemma for `Pairwise` as applied to a relation on a subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Feb 25, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat: Subsingleton.pairwise [Merged by Bors] - feat: Subsingleton.pairwise Feb 25, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Feb 25, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the jsm28/Subsingleton.pairwise branch February 25, 2024 14:49
riccardobrasca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
We have `Set.Subsingleton.pairwise`, but not, it seems, the corresponding lemma for `Pairwise` as applied to a relation on a subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.
dagurtomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
We have `Set.Subsingleton.pairwise`, but not, it seems, the corresponding lemma for `Pairwise` as applied to a relation on a subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
We have `Set.Subsingleton.pairwise`, but not, it seems, the corresponding lemma for `Pairwise` as applied to a relation on a subsingleton type rather than a subsingleton set.

From AperiodicMonotilesLean.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants