[Merged by Bors] - feat: cons lemmas for Finset.noncommProd
#11194
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eric-wieser
added
awaiting-review
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks! bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
mathlib-bors
bot
changed the title
cons lemmas for Finset.noncommProdcons lemmas for Finset.noncommProd
kbuzzard
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
dagurtomas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
utensil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
Louddy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
uniwuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
callesonne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
These are more general than the `insert` versions as they do not assume `DecidableEq`. This also lets some later proofs be golfed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are more general than the
insertversions as they do not assumeDecidableEq.This also lets some later proofs be golfed.