-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - fix(LinearAlgebra/Projectivization/Independence): use DivisionRing instead of Field #11232
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Can you add some one or two-sentence explanation in the PR description about why this is reasonable? Something like "I need this to follow <some paper/textbook>", or "I need this to construct <something more general>".
Thank you, done! |
bors merge Thanks! |
👎 Rejected by label |
bors merge |
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
…stead of Field (#11232) I need $K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called *division ring*)."
I need$K$ to be a skew field instead of a field to prove that projectivization of a vector space is a projective geometry stated in proposition 2.1.6 in the book "Modern Projective Geometry" by Claude-Alain Faure and Alfred Frölicher, see p. 27-28. In p.27, just before the proposition, it is noted that "... $K$ is allowed to be a skew field (often called division ring)."