Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - fix: rename MvPolynomial.C_mul_X #11574

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Ruben-VandeVelde
Copy link
Collaborator

This makes it consistent with MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow and MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow below. Alternatively all three could go into the MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous namespace.


Open in Gitpod

@Ruben-VandeVelde Ruben-VandeVelde added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI labels Mar 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors merge

Thanks!

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Mar 22, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title fix: rename MvPolynomial.C_mul_X [Merged by Bors] - fix: rename MvPolynomial.C_mul_X Mar 22, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Mar 22, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the MvPolynomial.C_mul_X branch March 23, 2024 00:00
utensil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
atarnoam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
uniwuni pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
callesonne pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
This makes it consistent with `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow` and `MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow` below. Alternatively all three could go into the `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous` namespace.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants