New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat: existence of a limit in a concrete category implies smallness #11625
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…forget-preserves-limits
joelriou
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
awaiting-CI
labels
Mar 24, 2024
1 task
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 26, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
removed
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 26, 2024
TwoFX
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Sorry for letting this sit for so long, let's hope it still applies cleanly...
bors r+
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
ready-to-merge
This PR has been sent to bors.
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Apr 7, 2024
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2024
…11625) In this PR, it is shown that if a functor `G : J ⥤ C` to a concrete category has a limit and that `forget C` is corepresentable, then `G ⋙ forget C).sections` is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules. In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file `Limits.Yoneda`. In order to do this, a small refactor of the file `Limits.Types` was necessary. This introduces bijections like `compCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)` with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports in `Limits.Yoneda`, part of the file `Limits.Types` was moved to a new file `Limits.TypesFiltered`. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
mathlib-bors
bot
changed the title
feat: existence of a limit in a concrete category implies smallness
[Merged by Bors] - feat: existence of a limit in a concrete category implies smallness
Apr 7, 2024
Louddy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…11625) In this PR, it is shown that if a functor `G : J ⥤ C` to a concrete category has a limit and that `forget C` is corepresentable, then `G ⋙ forget C).sections` is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules. In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file `Limits.Yoneda`. In order to do this, a small refactor of the file `Limits.Types` was necessary. This introduces bijections like `compCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)` with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports in `Limits.Yoneda`, part of the file `Limits.Types` was moved to a new file `Limits.TypesFiltered`. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
atarnoam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
…11625) In this PR, it is shown that if a functor `G : J ⥤ C` to a concrete category has a limit and that `forget C` is corepresentable, then `G ⋙ forget C).sections` is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules. In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file `Limits.Yoneda`. In order to do this, a small refactor of the file `Limits.Types` was necessary. This introduces bijections like `compCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)` with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports in `Limits.Yoneda`, part of the file `Limits.Types` was moved to a new file `Limits.TypesFiltered`. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
uniwuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
…11625) In this PR, it is shown that if a functor `G : J ⥤ C` to a concrete category has a limit and that `forget C` is corepresentable, then `G ⋙ forget C).sections` is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules. In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file `Limits.Yoneda`. In order to do this, a small refactor of the file `Limits.Types` was necessary. This introduces bijections like `compCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)` with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports in `Limits.Yoneda`, part of the file `Limits.Types` was moved to a new file `Limits.TypesFiltered`. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
callesonne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
…11625) In this PR, it is shown that if a functor `G : J ⥤ C` to a concrete category has a limit and that `forget C` is corepresentable, then `G ⋙ forget C).sections` is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules. In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file `Limits.Yoneda`. In order to do this, a small refactor of the file `Limits.Types` was necessary. This introduces bijections like `compCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)` with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports in `Limits.Yoneda`, part of the file `Limits.Types` was moved to a new file `Limits.TypesFiltered`. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR, it is shown that if a functor
G : J ⥤ C
to a concrete category has a limit and thatforget C
is corepresentable, thenG ⋙ forget C).sections
is small. As the corepresentability property holds in many concrete categories (e.g. groups, abelian groups) and that we already know since #11420 that limits exist under the smallness assumption in such categories, then this lemma may be used in future PR in order to show that usual forgetful functors preserve all limits (regardless of universe assumptions). This shall be convenient in the development of sheaves of modules.In this PR, universes assumptions have also been generalized in the file
Limits.Yoneda
. In order to do this, a small refactor of the fileLimits.Types
was necessary. This introduces bijections likecompCoyonedaSectionsEquiv (F : J ⥤ C) (X : C) : (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X)).sections ≃ ((const J).obj X ⟶ F)
with general universe parameters. In order to reduce imports inLimits.Yoneda
, part of the fileLimits.Types
was moved to a new fileLimits.TypesFiltered
.