Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat: add transparency option to solve_by_elim #1609

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

semorrison
Copy link
Contributor


Open in Gitpod

@semorrison semorrison added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands labels Jan 17, 2023
@digama0
Copy link
Member

digama0 commented Jan 17, 2023

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 17, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heather Macbeth <25316162+hrmacbeth@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jan 17, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat: add transparency option to solve_by_elim [Merged by Bors] - feat: add transparency option to solve_by_elim Jan 17, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Jan 17, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the solve_by_elim_transparency branch January 17, 2023 03:38
jcommelin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heather Macbeth <25316162+hrmacbeth@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants