New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Port op_induction #4551
Comments
I don't think this is actually necessary. I wrote new induction principle, and |
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2023
Closes #4551. Essentially `op_induction` is not necessary, now that `Opposite.rec'` is labelled with `@[eliminator]`. It would be nice if we could use this from inside `aesop`, see leanprover-community/aesop#59. Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@anu.edu.au>
semorrison
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2023
Closes #4551. Essentially `op_induction` is not necessary, now that `Opposite.rec'` is labelled with `@[eliminator]`. It would be nice if we could use this from inside `aesop`, see leanprover-community/aesop#59. Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@anu.edu.au>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Both the tactic and the attribute
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: