Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(Topology/{Paracompact + PartitionOfUnity + Algebra/Order/Compact}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" push_neg #5132

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adomani
Copy link
Collaborator

@adomani adomani commented Jun 16, 2023

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with push_neg/contradiction. Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply grepped the line after a contra, then grepped for a not and then selected 3 likely candidates. There are potentially more situations like these.


Open in Gitpod

@adomani adomani changed the title chore(): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" push_neg chore(Topology/{Paracompact + PartitionOfUnity + Algebra/Order/Compact}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" push_neg Jun 16, 2023
@adomani adomani added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jun 16, 2023
@semorrison
Copy link
Contributor

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jun 18, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
…t}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" `push_neg` (#5132)

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with `push_neg/contradiction`.  Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply `grep`ped the line after a `contra`, then `grep`ped for a `not` and then selected 3 likely candidates.  There are potentially more situations like these.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 18, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(Topology/{Paracompact + PartitionOfUnity + Algebra/Order/Compact}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" push_neg [Merged by Bors] - chore(Topology/{Paracompact + PartitionOfUnity + Algebra/Order/Compact}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" push_neg Jun 18, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 18, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the adomani_unchange_contras branch June 18, 2023 09:07
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
…t}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" `push_neg` (#5132)

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with `push_neg/contradiction`.  Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply `grep`ped the line after a `contra`, then `grep`ped for a `not` and then selected 3 likely candidates.  There are potentially more situations like these.
alexkeizer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2023
…t}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" `push_neg` (#5132)

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with `push_neg/contradiction`.  Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply `grep`ped the line after a `contra`, then `grep`ped for a `not` and then selected 3 likely candidates.  There are potentially more situations like these.
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
…t}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" `push_neg` (#5132)

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with `push_neg/contradiction`.  Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply `grep`ped the line after a `contra`, then `grep`ped for a `not` and then selected 3 likely candidates.  There are potentially more situations like these.
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2023
…t}): restore a more faithful mathported proof, using the "newer" `push_neg` (#5132)

These are just three cases where a mathported proof had to be changed, due to unwanted behaviour with `push_neg/contradiction`.  Since #5082 is supposed to fix some issues with these tactics, some of these workarounds can be removed.

Note: this was not in any way systematic, I simply `grep`ped the line after a `contra`, then `grep`ped for a `not` and then selected 3 likely candidates.  There are potentially more situations like these.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants