Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat: port Data.Pi.Algebra #564

Closed
wants to merge 34 commits into from

Conversation

joneugster
Copy link
Collaborator

@joneugster joneugster commented Nov 10, 2022

Mathlib SHA: 17a9f8f7a4ef32ee65d418103367cf30e84e631d

Done with the reviews. This should hopefully now be ready to merge.

@joneugster joneugster added help-wanted The author needs attention to resolve issues WIP Work in progress labels Nov 10, 2022
@digama0 digama0 added the mathlib-port This is a port of a theory file from mathlib. label Nov 13, 2022
@joneugster joneugster added awaiting-review blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR to Mathlib and removed help-wanted The author needs attention to resolve issues WIP Work in progress labels Nov 16, 2022
@joneugster joneugster added awaiting-review and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Nov 24, 2022
@semorrison
Copy link
Contributor

@semorrison semorrison added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review labels Nov 25, 2022
@joneugster joneugster added awaiting-review and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Nov 28, 2022
@semorrison
Copy link
Contributor

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review labels Nov 28, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
- [x] depends on: #579 

Mathlib SHA: 17a9f8f7a4ef32ee65d418103367cf30e84e631d

Done with the reviews. This should hopefully now be ready to merge.

Co-authored-by: Jon <jon.eugster@gmx.ch>
Co-authored-by: Jon Eugster <eugster.jon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 28, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat: port Data.Pi.Algebra [Merged by Bors] - feat: port Data.Pi.Algebra Nov 28, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 28, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the JE/Data.Pi.Algebra branch November 28, 2022 16:05
rosborn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
* master: (26 commits)
  docs (Order.BoundedOrder): fix typos (#775)
  feat: port Algebra.Order.Monoid.Cancel.Defs (#774)
  feat: port Order.Disjoint (#773)
  feat: port linarith (#526)
  feat: port Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs (#771)
  feat: port control.functor (#612)
  feat(Algebra/GroupWithZero/Commute): port file (#762)
  feat: port Logic.Equiv.Option (#674)
  chore: fix todos in `to_additive` (#765)
  feat(Algebra/Order/Monoid/MinMax): port file (#763)
  fix: update context in recursive calls in split_ifs (#761)
  feat(Algebra/Regular/Basic): port file (#758)
  feat: port Order.BoundedOrder (#697)
  feat: port Data.Pi.Algebra (#564)
  feat: port Algebra.Hom.Embedding (#764)
  fix: to_additive generates equation lemmas for target (#767)
  fix: fix translation errors in various files (#716)
  fix: remove submodules (#766)
  feat(Algebra/Group/Commute): port file (#750)
  feat(Algebra/Ring/Commute): port file (#759)
  ...
bors bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Regenerated from the [port status wiki page](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/wiki/mathlib4-port-status).
Relates to the following PRs:
* `algebra.field.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#668
* `algebra.group.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#750
* `algebra.group_with_zero.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#762
* `algebra.group_with_zero.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#757
* `algebra.group_with_zero.units.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#735
* `algebra.hom.embedding`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#764
* `algebra.order.monoid.cancel.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#774
* `algebra.order.monoid.canonical.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#778
* `algebra.order.monoid.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#771
* `algebra.order.monoid.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#763
* `algebra.order.monoid.order_dual`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#786
* `algebra.order.sub.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#732
* `algebra.regular.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#758
* `algebra.ring.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#759
* `algebra.ring.regular`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#795
* `algebra.ring.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#751
* `control.applicative`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#798
* `control.functor`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#612
* `control.monad.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#752
* `data.countable.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#736
* `data.int.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#807
* `data.nat.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#729
* `data.nat.psub`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#806
* `data.nat.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#805
* `data.pi.algebra`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#564
* `data.prod.lex`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#783
* `logic.embedding.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#700
* `logic.equiv.option`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#674
* `order.bounded_order`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#697
* `order.with_bot`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#776
* `order.disjoint`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#773
* `order.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#728
* `order.prop_instances`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#792
* `order.rel_iso.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#772
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mathlib-port This is a port of a theory file from mathlib. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants