Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: scope notations from category theory. #5685

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

Make sure in particular one can import Mathlib.Tactic for teaching without getting category theory notations in scope. Note that only two files needed an extra open.


See Zulip conversation.

Open in Gitpod

@PatrickMassot PatrickMassot added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. labels Jul 3, 2023
@sgouezel
Copy link
Contributor

sgouezel commented Jul 3, 2023

Could you do the same for the notations in CategoryTheory.Functor.Basic?

@PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member Author

Good point, I'll work on this.

@PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member Author

The functor notations are now also scoped. This required a bit more fixing in random files.

Comment on lines -20 to -21
(Unfortunately the `⇒` arrow (`\functor`) is taken by core,
but in mathlib4 we should switch to this.)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should keep this comment.

Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@semorrison semorrison added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 3, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2023
Make sure in particular one can import Mathlib.Tactic for teaching without getting category theory notations in scope. Note that only two files needed an extra open.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 3, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title chore: scope notations from category theory. [Merged by Bors] - chore: scope notations from category theory. Jul 3, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 3, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the patrick_scoped_category_theory branch July 3, 2023 19:15
kbuzzard pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
Make sure in particular one can import Mathlib.Tactic for teaching without getting category theory notations in scope. Note that only two files needed an extra open.
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
Make sure in particular one can import Mathlib.Tactic for teaching without getting category theory notations in scope. Note that only two files needed an extra open.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants