Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Analysis.Seminorm): remove useless assumption #5734

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ADedecker
Copy link
Member

This removes a chance to infer an argument, but I think that's a fairly good use case for using the new named arguments, because adding (r := _) to specify a radius feels completely right.


Open in Gitpod

@ADedecker ADedecker added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR new-feature Add features not present in Mathlib 3 labels Jul 5, 2023
@sgouezel
Copy link
Contributor

sgouezel commented Jul 5, 2023

Great, thanks!
bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jul 5, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2023
This removes a chance to infer an argument, but I think that's a fairly good use case for using the new named arguments, because adding `(r := _)` to specify a radius feels completely right.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(Analysis.Seminorm): remove useless assumption [Merged by Bors] - feat(Analysis.Seminorm): remove useless assumption Jul 5, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 5, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the AD_seminorm_continuity_fix branch July 5, 2023 14:19
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
This removes a chance to infer an argument, but I think that's a fairly good use case for using the new named arguments, because adding `(r := _)` to specify a radius feels completely right.
kbuzzard pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
This removes a chance to infer an argument, but I think that's a fairly good use case for using the new named arguments, because adding `(r := _)` to specify a radius feels completely right.
semorrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
This removes a chance to infer an argument, but I think that's a fairly good use case for using the new named arguments, because adding `(r := _)` to specify a radius feels completely right.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-feature Add features not present in Mathlib 3 ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants