New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - fix: make an ideal lemma more constructive #6080
Conversation
!bench |
Here are the benchmark results for commit 8458687.Found no runs to compare against. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
bors d+
✌️ kbuzzard can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors r+ |
This generalizes `Ideal.pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow` away from `Classical.decEq`.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
This generalizes `Ideal.pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow` away from `Classical.decEq`.
This generalizes
Ideal.pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow
away fromClassical.decEq
.See if this changes anything