New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat: lemmas about monotonicity and asymptotics of rpow
#6140
Conversation
dupuisf
commented
Jul 25, 2023
rpow
and exp
rpow
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are just golfs, but I think they actually improve readability rather than hindering it. In particular, it put the main content in a single refine
so that we can see these are all just the same pattern: tendsto_exp_at{Bot,Top}.comp <| tendsto_const_mul_at{Bot,Top}_...
This also avoids a lot of unnecessary have
s and show
s.
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
bors r+ |
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
rpow
rpow